Doublespeak Democracy
The House Judiciary Committee revealed that the Ukrainian SBU not only censored American’s speech, but compromised National Security due to the infiltration of Ukraine by Russian intelligence.
Mass manipulation through words is the most subtle form of propaganda known to man. Throughout the 20th century propaganda has been used as a way to normalize what people once upheld as classically liberal principles. Since the idea of democracy was introduced into the collective consciousness of human civilization there have been tyrannical overlords trying to destroy it. This possible destruction of democracy is something that George Orwell knew very well, and it is the reason why he wrote his brilliant masterpiece, 1984.
The theme in the literary classic was an analysis of authoritarianism and its ultimate endgame of worldwide civilizational enslavement. George Orwell created a world for what he viewed as the playbook for tyranny. Today the unelected organization of tyrants like the United Nations are using the same playbook that Orwell envisioned. Orwell analyzed the most subtle Psychological Warfare tactics that are being used in our world today, a term Orwell’s followers called Double Speak.
From the War of 1812 to WW2, to now, the world’s elite ruling aristocracy have been orchestrating democracy’s downfall. The United States of America was the first nation to implement a system that gave power to the people, and it has been the American people that have been defending it ever since.
The United States was the first nation to create a truly free press. Before the creation of “the free press” everyone had to be subjected to propaganda from the King. The Kings views were the peasants views and there was no straying from the Monarchy’s accepted narrative. Unfortunately we are returning back to those days of royal feudalism. In a way the King of England was carrying out the same kind of propaganda that the original American revolutionaries were exposed to by the redcoats.
Psychological warfare (the fancy term for weaponized propaganda) is a clear and present danger to the survival of democracy in a free society, yet nobody knows what it is, or why it is being used on the American people. Back in 2012, the Smith Mundt Act was revised allowing the American Government to openly spread propaganda in the mainstream news. The very important act was made shortly after WW2 to make sure that the propagandist atrocities of Nazi Germany did not happen in America.
Around the same time that “wokeness” was injected into the minds of Americans, Barack Obama signed the revision of this act, which made it ineffectual. Essentially, this very important act was neutered after a long life of vitality, and it was the beginning of the end for academic and journalistic integrity in America.
AP News defended the act in 2019 and wrote a fact checking article that was factually nonsensical. They wrote,
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. In 2013, Obama signed legislation that changed the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, also known as the Smith-Mundt Act. The amendment made it possible for some materials created by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, the nation’s foreign broadcasting agency, to be disseminated in the U.S.
THE FACTS: A post circulating on Facebook with a photo of Obama falsely states he repealed a ban on government propaganda in the U.S. when he signed the National Defense Authorization Act in 2013. The amendment did not repeal the Smith-Mundt Act, but rather lifted some restrictions on the domestic dissemination of government-funded media.
Basically AP News lied and then immediately covered up the truth through the manipulation of words. They basically said, “No the sky isn’t blue because its not green or yellow.” Or if someone said, “hey did you get your cat neutered” and you said, “NO! I had their genitals removed by the vet, but they didn’t get neutered.” False fact-check articles like these never go into detail of what, “lifting some restrictions” means or what making “it possible for some materials” truly entails. These deceptive tactics obfuscate the truth through the manipulation of words, which is a form of propaganda in itself.
The truth is that the national security state in America has completely taken over and weaponized what is supposed to be a free press. This is something that mainstream propagandists admit themselves. They make it sound so innocent when they “revise” a bill like the Smith Mundt Act, meanwhile they take the propaganda to a sensational extreme like introducing “woke gender ideology” in classrooms. Woke gender ideology in classrooms shouldn’t even be a political debate when you have a massive military budget that is cheerleading for conflict in a future world war. Ultimately these things can be a distraction from what truly matters.
In George Orwell’s book 1984, he wrote about terms that he created to describe the dystopia for which he envisioned. In this envisioned world a political party called IngSoc (English Socialism) ruled over everything each citizen did and said while the world was held in a state of perpetual war. (Sound familiar?)
Newspeak and doublethink, which scholars later adapted into doublespeak, were terms and phrases that had meaning in that they meant the exact opposite of what they represented. Doublethink was the surrealism of holding two contradictory viewpoints at the same time, while Orwell’s newspeak puts those contradictory thoughts into authoritarian government policy.
Examples for this were phrases like “War is Peace,” and government agencies like the Ministry of Truth and the Ministry of Love. These organizations and phrases represented the exact opposite of what they claimed. In reality, the Ministry of Truth was the center for propaganda, and the Ministry of Love was a re-education camp that monitored every citizen’s action and punished any form of dissent. The Ministry of Peace would fight wars overseas, while the Ministry of Plenty would distribute the dwindling resources that were plundered by the state.
These thoughts and concepts were always representative of socialist regimes like communism and fascism. These regimes had just emerged in the days of George Orwell and were still fresh in the minds of men. In fact, George Orwell was a democratic socialist who held libertarianism, traditionalism, and humanism in high-esteem.
Strangely many modern political activists on the American right have used Orwell as an inspiration, while the socialist activists on the left have all but abandoned his teachings. This may be because the right has hijacked the “truther movement” and used it for its own political gains, while the left has been brainwashed to believe that Orwellian warnings are just “conspiracies.”
I believe if Orwell were alive today he would be classified as a libertarian centrist, and would not subscribe to the woke ideology that is poisoning the minds of Americans. Orwell was a traditionalist and he would have seen the inherent authoritarianism within the woke agenda. The brilliant author would probably vote for a candidate like RFK Jr., or he would be an independent voter, maybe a third-party voter, or he wouldn’t vote at all.
Orwell was an atheist, but he was also a traditionalist so maybe he would be sympathetic to guys like Nigel Farage or Donald Trump, but this seems unlikely. One thing I do know for certain, is that he would undoubtedly be an activist. After noticing and realizing the growing trend of authoritarian tyranny in the world, he would be writing masterpieces and picketing in the streets.
In the United Kingdom, George Orwell’s native country, political persecution is peaking at dangerous levels. Nigel Farage, after expressing his desire to get back into politics, was outlawed from using a bank account and was denied access by seven other banks. He went on YouTube to vocalize his frustrations and the video received over 350K views.
The very popular former politician and broadcaster explained his concern that governments in western democracies are tyrannizing their citizens by taking away their right to have a bank account. Nigel mentioned how this modern day form of fascism was being used to persecute Canadians during the lockdown-protests of 2021 where tens of thousands of Canadian Truckers filled the streets.
Many Canadians had their bank accounts frozen so they could not fund and carry out the protests. The freezing of accounts was done digitally in real time using advanced and illegal surveillance methods as protesters chanted, “I…I believe…I believe that….I believe that we….I believe that we will win!!!” It was an ominous scene as riot police backed up in the snow to a crowd of at least ten thousand peaceful protestors.
This blatant abuse of civil and human rights is astounding to see in an age that seems to be more Orwellian every day. A successful Democracy doesn't freeze its citizens bank accounts every time citizens decide to protest or when a influential politician decides to run for office. The Doublespeak version of Democracy has arrived in the new authoritarian west, or what I call “the anti-free west.”
In America, politicians that decide to run for office are absurdly declared “a threat to democracy.” The pervasive doublespeak in propagandist headlines is without a doubt a sadistic homage to Orwell. The things the American press declare is “a threat to Democracy” are actually inherent and essential in a supposedly democratic society.
Headlines like “RFK Jr. is a threat to your health—and our Democracy” shows how the propagandist doublespeak operates in America. Hyperbolic Speeches from Joe Biden claiming that “democracy is under assault” because of “election deniers” is a commonplace in America while the manipulation through words is used fast and loose. In actuality, it is a very healthy democratic principle for voters to question the integrity of elections.
The Neo-Marxist Anti-liberal Democrats did nothing but question elections since the year 2000. They completely divided the nation after they rightfully lost the Presidential election in 2016. They accused Donald Trump of being a Russian spy over and over and over again, yet arrogantly refused to acknowlege that they screwed Bernie Sanders out of the primary. In fact still to this day Adam Schiff still won’t let the Trump collusion narrative go. The delusional politician even wrote a book about it. (Hopefully, nobody read it.) This raises the question that nobody can answer: Is collusion even a crime?
The Washington Post doesn’t think so, they wrote a piece (of crap) that claimed that collusion isn’t even a crime in 2018, yet that is what everybody was force-fed during the Trump presidency. Constant bombardment by the propagandist media ripped the country apart to the point that it is in a suspended state of cold civil war.
The cold civil war continues today with an article from an organization that is supposed to be the greatest research institutions known to man. The Brookings Institution wrote that the leading Republican presidential candidate in the nation is “Not the Only Threat to Democracy.” They used divisive hyperbole by claiming that unarmed MAGA Me-maws almost overturned America’s 250 year old democratic system on January 6th.
The Brookings Institution wrote this fine piece of propaganda
The investigations into the January 6, 2021 Capitol Hill insurrection reveal how close America came to overturning its democratic system. The peaceful transfer of power that has long characterized U.S. history was threatened last year and it took considerable effort on the part of many individuals to survive the challenges of Donald Trump and his allies. Disturbing testimony over the last few weeks revealed coordinated efforts to seat Electoral College electors who did not represent the winning side of the popular vote and lawyers who encouraged then-sitting Vice President Mike Pence to nullify two centuries of constitutional rule through the view that he alone could decide who won the campaign.
Yet it is a mistake to focus solely on Donald Trump’s role in these efforts. In my Brookings Institution Press book, Power Politics: Trump and the Assault on American Democracy, I argue there are several systemic threats to the future of democracy, such as copycat candidates, legal coups, a toxic information ecosystem, the decline of authoritative institutions, and the widespread prevalence of counter-majoritarianism in our political system. Trump represents an existential threat to our current system, but he is not the only challenge facing the country.
One of the problems we have now is the rise of copycat candidates who parrot Trump’s moves and endorse his anti-democratic tactics. Possible presidential candidates Ron DeSantis, Ted Cruz, and Josh Hawley as well as dozens of congressional candidates spread the Big Lie about 2020 election fraud and some Republicans show a willingness to have electors chosen who do not respect the popular vote winner within particular states.
One of the worst things Trump has done is to show many other aspirants how to engage in power politics using unethical steps. Between his unorthodox behaviors challenging the legitimacy of the 2020 results and his continuing efforts to push Republicans in illiberal directions, he has become a role model for many candidates around the country. Rather than seeing Trump as a dangerous demagogue who threatens our democratic system, many Republican candidates are mimicking his tactics and pushing the country down the road towards illiberalism.
Propaganda like the Brooking Institute claim, to be partisan and fair, but they are the complete opposite to the point that they are the very threat to democracy they claim to be exposing. The real threat to democracy is the Orwellian propaganda of the mainstream corporate media. This propaganda is technologically advanced and beyond pervasive with AI algorithms that spy on every scroll of your touchscreen and predict every click of your mouse.
Social media sites know what you are thinking before you think it, as AI technology is able to study your profile and tailor your news feed to what you like the most. The AI algorithm picks the news stories that it thinks you should see for the profile that fits you best. If you are right leaning it sends you Fox news, if it you are left leaning the AI gives you CNN. This is social engineering at its finest.
The proof that social engineering is being used on the public is evident when you realize the very real loss of our 1st amendment rights. It was exposed by Jim Jordan and other congressman recently in a House Judiciary Committee that the Ukrainian SBU and the FBI were working together to silence Americans on social media. These two Gestapo agencies were monitoring American citizens and colluding to take down social media posts.
A document called, The FBI’s Collaboration with a Compromised Ukrainian Intelligence Agency to Censor American Speech, was released on July 10th, 2023 that details how the US Government colluded with a compromised foreign agency to violate the Constitution. After the release of the document, Jim Jordan and several other members of Congress questioned FBI director Christopher Wray in several heated conversations. Christopher Wray answered back in a blinking fit of lies that resembled a police interrogation of a known criminal. The entire hearing revealed that the FBI is a cesspool of deceit.
The brave congressman Jim Jordan made an opening statement to the hearing where he explained a ruling that was made in Louisiana that showed that the Biden’s federal government used its tyrannical power to silence Americans. He quoted the Louisiana court that compared the government’s role to “an Orwellian Ministry of Truth.”
The House committee document revealed that the Russian Federation had infiltrated the Ukrainian SBU using double agents. The Russian Federation’s FSB infiltrated multiple levels of the Ukrainian SBU, and because of the collusion of the FBI, had given American data to the Russian Federation using the Ukrainian SBU as a conduit.
Because the Ukrainian SBU was compromised it unintentionally acted as the middleman between The Russian Federation and American citizens. This unintentional act revealed that the FBI was actually harming national security by working with the Gestapo-like FSB. Considering there ARE Nazis in Ukraine, and they have worked to shut down Christian churches as well as hunt down political opposition, there is no hyperbole needed to reveal that the Ukrainian SBU and the FBI are literally the equivalent of the Nazi Gestapo SS.
The House of Representatives document wrote this,
The Committee’s investigation has revealed that the FBI, the federal law enforcement agency responsible for disrupting foreign malign influence, facilitated censorship requests to American social media companies on behalf of a Ukrainian intelligence agency infiltrated by Russian-aligned actors. In so doing, the FBI violated the First Amendment rights of Americans and potentially undermined our national security.
One congresswoman who was very vocal about this was Victoria Spartz who compared the FBI to “the KGB.” She passionately pointed out how dangerous it is for the Russian Federations FSB to have American’s social media data in their possession.
Potentially, the Russian Federation could target military commanders, Intelligence Officials, and even politicians with information that could have been compromised by the FBI and the Ukrainian SBU. This is despicable on its face, yet the establishment Democrats stupidly and arrogantly don’t seem to recognize that their own safety could be at risk. Especially, the ignorant and arrogant Adam Schiff who is a Chair of the House Intelligence Committee.
What Adam doesn’t realize, because of the breach and infiltration of social media by the Russians, his personal information could have been compromised by the collusion of the FBI with the SBU. The reason for this is because the FBI did not vett any of the information that the SBU was given, and data was given back and forth between the SBU and FBI, which was then infiltrated by Russian intelligence. Nobody knows what information Russian FSB intelligence got their hands on in this social media data cesspool at the FBI.
The House Committee’s well-written document revealed that the SBU tried to hide the very fact that there ARE Nazi battalions fighting Russians in Ukraine by censoring Americans that spoke out about it. The mind-numbing possibility that the FBI let a foreign government censor Americans through social media corporations, it the literal definition of Technocratic Fascism and is beyond unconstitutional. In fact, this evidence should be taken to the Supreme Court to be scrutinized, or we do not live in a constitutional republic governed by a democracy; we live in some form of Technocratic Fascism governed by an Oligarchy.
The entire questioning by the House Judiciary resembled a Hollywood movie. It was a must see, as courageous Congressman like Matt Gaetz grilled Christopher Wray on his inexcusable defense of the Biden family’s blatant corruption. One recurring theme that is very accurate is that there is a double standard in this two-tiered justice system that lets some politicians remain uninvestigated while others are raided by militant SWAT teams.
The FBI is so broken that the document revealed that the FBI allowed the Ukrainian SBU to censor the State Department’s social media account. The FBI did not disseminate any of the requests that the SBU made and just willy-nilly censored whoever the Ukrainians wanted, including the American governments own state department.
The House of Representatives document said this,
The Committee’s analysis of these “disinformation” registries revealed that the FBI, at the request of the SBU, flagged for social media companies the authentic accounts of Americans, including a verified U.S. State Department account and those belonging to American journalists. The FBI and SBU repeatedly requested the removal or suspension of authentic accounts expressing unambiguously pro-Ukrainian views, as well as those voicing opposition to Russian President Vladimir Putin. At times, the FBI would even follow up with the relevant platform to ensure that “these accounts were taken down.” Regardless of its intended purpose in endorsing the SBU’s requests, the FBI had no legal justification for facilitating the censorship of Americans’ protected speech on social media.
The most frustrating thing about the FBI violating the Constitution is that the FBI is only supposed to be involved in domestic affairs. The pandemonium of unaccountable alphabet agencies is like an unorganized circus because they do not follow their own laws. For more than a century it was understood that the FBI was for affairs that were specifically American, yet the FBI has branched out all over the planet to implement their police state tyranny.
The CIA was put together to deal with foreign affairs, while the FBI was originally for domestic proceedings but this seems to have flipped upside down and inside out. The CIA was exposed as being involved with domestic affairs during the Church committee revelation of Operation Mockingbird, and their reluctantly admitted infiltration of Hollywood. Meanwhile, the Federal Bureau of Investigations is allowed to investigate and arrest anyone on the planet while they blatantly violate the American Constitution.
The reality is that both of these agencies do not care about the Constitution and act as an Orwellian arm of the establishment bureaucracy. They act as quasi-mercenary groups that do the bidding of the Military Industrial Complex, billionaire CEO’s, and Washington lobbyists. They do not care about the rights of the American people and never have. From the 1st Amendment to the 4th Amendment, it doesn’t matter to these well-dressed tyrannical thugs. The question that needs to be asked is: Does the overreaching involvement of foreign and domestic affairs make America more or less safe?
The House of Representatives Document even involved left-wing “socialist” outlets showing the bipartisan effort for the FBI to violate the rights of journalists, the government document said this,
The list of Instagram accounts that the SBU requested the FBI to have removed also included that of an American journalist who serves on the staff of a self-styled “socialist” news organization based in the United States. The journalist has written extensively advocating for transgender rights, and has repeatedly criticized Republicans.
The FBI and Ukrainian SBU indiscriminately censored Americans speech on social media to the point that they did not even know who they were censoring, they just based who they censored on what their social media posts said. This in itself is an Orwellian form of social engineering.
Another part of the Government document said this,
The censorship requests appear to have been driven, at least in part, by the SBU’s quest for self-preservation. In the attachments to the March 14 e-mail, the SBU also flagged accounts that were “discrediting the SBU leadership” and “promoting the shift of legitimate power.” The e-mail included two attachments, one with a list of Facebook accounts and the other with a list of Instagram accounts. Just four months later, Zelensky simultaneously removed the head of the SBU, Ivan Bakanov, and accused those within the SBU’s top brass of treason.
America and Ukraine set a horrible example of how “a democracy” is supposed to conduct their affairs. This horrible example is seen by America’s adversaries as extremely hypocritical and unfortunately gave them fuel to discredit the FBI and the Ukrainian government through an international political setting. In simple terms, this gives Russia and China a reason to show that America and Ukraine are equally corrupt and are collectively full of shit.
A revelation that was beyond nonsensical is that the FBI censored pro-Ukrainian speech that was critical of Putin. This is a perfect example of why the Constitution is so important and why we should always protect everyone’s right to speak freely, especially a journalist like the one you are giving your attention to right now.
The House Select Committee document revealed this,
In contrast to the Biden Administration’s stated support for Ukraine, the FBI, on behalf of the SBU, flagged Americans’ accounts and posts that were critical of Vladimir Putin and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. For example, in response to a post by a government official serving the Russian region of Tuva, one flagged American account wrote, “[i]t strikes me as odd that at this tragic time of international crisis initiated by Russia’s invasion of a sovereign nation, Tuva’s highest elected federal official has time to spend arguing with a foreigner, trying to convince me that the Ukrainian government and their Jewish president are Nazis.”
The flagged post is no longer available, but the Russian government official’s original post, to which the American was responding, has not been removed. Another flagged post reads, in Russian, “I was lucky enough to wake up in sunny California. But my family is there in Ukraine. My parents, stepparent, my aunt, my sister, my nephew, my baby’s nanny, my mother-in-law, who already survived the war as a child, my friends, my colleagues, my city, and my country.”
The same U.S.-based poster also reacted to allegations that the Russian minority in Ukraine have been persecuted, writing, “I am half Russian. I am a Russian Ukrainian. I have never been asked to switch to Ukrainian, not by anyone or anywhere. Neither I nor anyone else was forbidden to speak Russian in Ukraine.” The post concludes with a series of hashtags, in English, including “#stopputin,” “#freeukraine,” and “#nowarinukraine.”
The red pill that we are all going to have to swallow at some point in time is that the FBI has dangerously compromised national intelligence and have violated the Constitution over and over and over again. This Orwellian organization has built an Orwellian society that does not resemble a democracy or a constitutional republic.
We should all be grateful of righteous leaders like Jim Jordan and Chip Roy that have the fortitude to question dodgy bureaucrats like Christopher Wray. Future leaders like the presidential incumbent Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and present leaders like the ones in the Select Committee, can restore America to what it once was, but they need our support. We all need to get politically active and support future leaders any way we can.
George Orwell, on his death bed, left us an ominous message that is timeless in its importance. He claimed that the only way to end governmental genocide like the tyranny that took place in the early 20th century, is to never let happen it again. Whatever that entails is up to you, whether you picket in the streets, or give money to political parties and their leaders, something has to be done to uphold the Constitution because the National Security bureaucracy has done everything but use the supreme law of the land for toilet paper.
George Orwell envisioned a tyrannical authoritarian world so that you didn’t have to. He was a literary hero that the FBI and the Ukrainian government would have kicked off of social media for speaking out. Free speech and the rights of journalists are something that Americans should never lose.
Countless numbers of brave soldiers have fought and died defending our rights. Many of these soldiers fought fascism on the frontlines in Italy and Germany, while in the modern age we the people defend fascists in Ukraine and allow them to take away our rights. The United States Government has given over $100 billion dollars to the Ukrainian government, and now we realize we have paid them to silence our speech. We should be ashamed of ourselves for letting this happen.
Whether you want to believe it or not, these are the facts that are being presented by the American Government, and it is up to the reader of this article to nonviolently do something about it. We can no longer sit on the sidelines while there is a “rules for me, but not for thee” type of mob justice that is being implemented throughout the free world.
Orwellian governments ruled by mob justice will only lead to tyranny, genocide, and slavery. The free world is staring death in the face, laying in a cold hard bed, contemplating life and wondering how many days it has left to lose. Fear is not an option, unless you want to end up like Winston and Julia. Like Orwell suggested, we have to choose a different path and realize how dangerous it is to be governed by a doublespeak democracy in an unconstitutional republic.
Defund FBI and CIA
I doubt seriously George Orwell's intent in writing 1984 was for the ds/gov't to use it as a blue print on what to do with it's employer (i.e., We The People). Too bad the ds/gov't didn't "get the memo."